Does Suzuki have the most reliable cars?

Ibrahim [GTR] · #1 (**permalink**) 10-08-2009, 05:47 PM

their cars last for AT LEAST 12 years minimum,

For ex:
In India and Pakistan, cars such as Alto, Khyber, Mehran, Cultus etc. are built there and the cars require very little maintenance, the engines are 1.0L thus they have excellent fuel efficiency, can survive up to 400,000KM. I've never seen such cars before..
I can honestly say Suzuki is extremely reliable along with Toyota and Honda..

What do you think?
IT doesnt matter how much you maintain a crapsler or GM garbage, their cars die after 200,000km

american cars are inferior compared to japanese.. FACT
yes Subaru is good as well
WHY are GM and crapsler and ford all these american car makers in debt.. no one is buying their garbage because people know its unreliable.. you can't handle the truth
american transmissions are poorly made and designed thus they die early

Vipassana · #2 (**permalink**) 10-08-2009, 05:47 PM

Nope.

People who maintain their cars, have the most reliable cars. That's all.

Doesn't matter if it's Honda, Kia, Suzuki, or Chevy.

A car doesn't maintain itself. Sure, it can survive up to 400,000 km, but not on it's own.

I bet I could take one, treat it poorly, and have it die in a year.

It's just a machine. Reliability only comes from the owner. Otherwise, it would last that long, without any help from me.

Simple logic, really.

Think of it this way, if you have to remind someone to be on time always, are they reliable? No. You reminding them, has made them reliable. That's all.

Johnny Rotten · #3 (**permalink**) 10-08-2009, 05:47 PM

yes you are correct...You also have to mention subaru...You have to remember that here in the u.s we are really spread out....Our country is alot larger than India...There fore most of their driving is in the cities....Yes we are way behind in the car industry..I,m waiting for a alternative fuel 4x4.I think that the hydrid is not the way to go....